Cpt Gobla
   |
Posted - 2009.04.07 00:50:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: Asuka Smith
Edited by: Asuka Smith on 05/04/2009 23:32:42
Originally by: Malcanis
Waiting to see some actual evidence that it's worse for children to be raised by gay parents.
Meanwhile, plenty of heterosexual couple do an atrocious job of it. Really, the bar is set pretty low when you think about it.
See, I think a lot of people are reading my posts but not understanding. I am not saying that gay parents will be worse parents, I am saying that they will be DIFFERENT parents. Right now we have a society built on certain normalcies, and adjusting the formula is going to change the way society functions. I am not sure that I am comfortable revolutionizing the human psyche without any regard for the possible consequences. I think that studies should be done and we should carefully weigh the potential risks and benefits, and in my mind the most serious risk is that we wind up with a genetic manipulation based society because children are more often artificially created than not.
As for animals that are homosexual in nature, this to me is proof that homosexuality is a genetic deformity. Girls crave boys, and boys crave girls, it is how nature has designed our instincts so that we will procreate as opposed to NOT procreating. If homosexuality was normal or even prevalent in any species then that species would soon become extinct. This alone should be proof that it is not what nature intended and in fact some form of genetic mutation that does mistakenly assigns the boy loving genes to another boy, on mistake.
There have been TWO penguins, that is the only gay nature couple that I know of. I am sure you will provide more links but they are anomalies not norms, and the gay-rights crowd needs to understand that. I know that this is going to raise some hackles but I hope that you can read through this and see my concern as more humanity-based rather than bigotry against some particular group for no reason. I advocate equal rights in ALL areas besides procreation.
EDIT: And any man of science will support me in my call for research on the subject, however nearly every gay that I know is deathly afraid of any research into homosexuality being genetic and thus proving it is a deformity rather than a "personal choice". I think it can be either as the human mind is much stronger than our instincts in some cases, particularly in the case of love, but I think that genetics are likely the driving force. And as a result of this fear from the gay community, and the ignorance of the religious right-wing, no research has been done and none likely will be done. It will remain purely political which is pretty stupid if you ask me.
Please explain exactly how you know what nature 'intended'.
You say homosexuality is a genetic deformity. Another cool word for genetic deformity is evolution.
You see, humans are actually nothing more then genetically deformed apes. Who again are nothing more then genetically deformed monkeys. Who are nothing more then genetically deformed rodents etc.
And I'm pretty sure that evolution is exactly what nature 'intended'. Now whether or not homosexuality is a successful form of evolution remains to be seen ( going by your assumption that homosexuality is a genetic deformity. ) But it most certainly is what nature 'intended'.
If it wasn't then most surely it wouldn't happen to kids gained the old fashion way and it would only happen to children conceived in test tubes who've had their DNA altered.
So your argument that homosexuality is not what nature intended is completely void. If it wasn't what nature intended then it wouldn't happen in nature, not even on a small scale.
ps. You might want to look into bonobos. They're a chimpanzee like species that's entirely made up of bisexual apes. And if it wasn't for human poachers the species would be doing quite well indeed. They've got no trouble procreating at all even though their males regularly have sex with other males.
|